Title Page Previous Next Contents | Part 2. The day after: How officials responded >The scene at Ground Zero |
Into
this devastated, almost apocalyptic war zone of a landscape marched a host of
different players from government, nonprofit groups, hospitals and medical
institutions, and private industry.
To some, it was an environmental health disaster from the very first. “Standing down there, with your eyes closed,” says Ron Burger, a public health advisor at the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who arrived in New York to help September 11th but didn’t arrive to the Ground Zero the site until the night of September 12th, “it could have been a tornado or an avalanche or a volcano.”
A veteran of disasters from the
Mississippi floods Mt. St. Helens, Burger said it reminded him most of the
volcano, if he forgot he was in downtown Manhattan. “Feeling the heat, seeing
the molten steel, the layers upon layers of ash, like lava, it reminded me of
Mt. St. Helen’s and the thousands who fled that disaster,” he said.
“It could have been a tornado or an avalanche or a volcano.”
Ground Zero was a
disaster site like no other—with hazards everywhere. Shards of steel lay upon
shards of steel, shifting and unstable, uncovering red hot metal beams
excavated from deep beneath layers of sub-floors, exposing further dark
crevasses. All around the 16-acre site lay millions of piles of debris, covered
in dust, with noxious smoke smoldering up, carrying unknown toxins, from
benzene to heavy metals, into surrounding neighborhoods.
![]() |
Photo:
Paul Olivier |
To
cope with a disaster of this magnitude, New York City had to coordinate its
operations with a vast number of local, state and federal agencies. Like the
Oklahoma City bombing incident, the affected geographical area was small but
involved massive damage to buildings. (There the comparison ends, since the
World Trade Centers were far taller and made of lightweight steel versus the
Murrah Building, made of concrete and only nine stories tall.)
Dr. Bruce Bernard,
a public health specialist at the National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in
Atlanta, who traveled to the site a few days after the terrorist attack,
remarked that the federal agency was aghast at the size and variety of hazards
present at the site—dust, blood borne pathogens, unstable structures, physical
injuries, heavy metals, carbon monoxide, hazards of being trapped in confined
spaces, and heat stress.
At
first, when NIOSH arrived, Bernard said,
“The major concern was dust.” But with thousands still thought to be
missing, and workers determined to stay until all potential survivors were
found, “health and safety was on the back burner,” according to Bernard. (2)